That's what the New Testament talks about, either the resurrection of the flesh or the resurrection of the body.

新约是如此描述的，肉体的复活,或者人体的复活。

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

Now I'm not going to hear, pursue of the question of "Do we believe bodily resurrection occurs or will occur?"

现在我不需要，大家一直争论,我们是否要相信,肉体复活是否会发生“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

According to official Christian orthodoxy, the form of your afterlife existence is the resurrection of the body.

根据基督教正统，人死后的存在形式,是人体的复活。

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

And particularly as probable as we were mentioning, that early Christians believed in something like the body theory of personal identity and believed in bodily resurrection.

尤其是我们刚刚,提到的那种可能,早期的基督教徒相信,人格同一性的肉体论,相信肉体复活。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

That's what van Inwagen would say, if that's the way body resurrection would work.

范·，因瓦根认为，肉体复活就是这个道理。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Then we have to say bodily resurrection would not be the very same body.

我们不得不承认肉体复活,无法得到原来的肉体。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If we are willing to believe in bodily resurrection.

如果我们相信,肉体复活的概念的话。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Still, at least the possibility that we could work these out is still there, so I suppose there is still at least the possibility that bodily resurrection would be coherent, in such way there would still be the same body.

至少还存在解答这些,问题的可能性，我认为至少还存在,这种可能性,肉体复活是存在的，这样的话就会产生原来的肉体。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

bodily resurrection."

这就是，肉体复活的概念“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And let's just suppose the correct theory of personal identity is Van Inwagen such as to put aside any worries we might have along with van Inwagen, that we discussed previously, as to whether or not on resurrection day that would really be you or not. Suppose it would be you.

假设正确的个人认同感理论是这样的,例如将之前讨论,理论时的种种担忧放在一边，也就是审判日当天,到底是不是真的你，我们假设就是你。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选