Poetic and practical language: you've already been hearing this in I.A. Richards and in the New Critics.
关于诗化的语言和实用的语言:,你们已经了解了理查兹,和新批评主义者。
That is a course that I like to teach, too; usually I teach Plato to T.S. Eliot or Plato to I.A. Richards or some other important figure in the early twentieth century.
这也是我喜欢教的一门课;,我通常教从柏拉图到T。S。艾略特,或从柏拉图到T。A。理查兹,或者其他20世纪初的重要人物。
You are really out on a limb - if you're going to defend poetry--as Richards kept doing-- as "pseudo-statement," but of course pseudo-statement" is just another expression for what he calls here "fiction."
你会陷入孤立无援的境地,如果你像,Richards一样-,说诗歌是“伪陈述“,当然,这里“伪陈述“只是,“虚构“的另一种说法“
He says, sort of toward the top of the right-hand column, page 768: It is evident that the bulk of poetry consists of statements which only the very foolish would think of attempting to verify.
右侧栏的上面,Richards写道:,诗歌中显然有大量不真实的陈述,而只有傻子才试图去核实它们。
Richards To declare Science autonomous is very different from subordinating all our activities to it.
还说道:,Then,he,says:,虽然说科学是自主的,但这并不是说一切都要服从于它。
Later on Richards changes his vocabulary, and he no longer talks about scientific and emotive language.
后来,Richards换了一种说法,他不在使用科学或者情感类的语言。
It is in fact, Richards goes so far as to say, following Plato, lying.
实际上,Richards赞同Plato的观点,认为诗歌是在撒谎。
As I say, this is the sense in which Empson follows Richards.
我认为,在这个方面Empson和Richards观点一致。
This is the intellectual focus, in other words, of Richards' work.
这是Richards作品关注的理性焦点。
That could be the motto for Richards' work.
这句话也是Richards作品的精髓。
There, you see, he diverges from his teacher, Richards.
这就是他和他的老师Richards的区别。
Just as Richards says, there's always something kind of archaic or atavistic about poetic thinking. It's not just that - it's not trying to tell the truth, as Sidney said-- "nothing lieth because it never affirmeth."
就像Richards说的,关于诗意的思考,总有些事情过时了,诗歌并非,拒绝陈述事实,正如Sidney说的-,“没有伪造的东西因为一切都不是真的“
The reason this fulfillment is important and can be valued is, - according to Richards, that these needs-- unless they are organized or harmonized so that they work together in what he sometimes calls a "synthesis"-- can actually tear us apart.
这种满足之所以重要而有价值是因为,根据Richards的观点,我们的需求-,如果没有被和谐地组织起来,形成一个综合体-,它们会将我们粉碎。
应用推荐