And the solution to this equation looks like this where it is written in terms of a quantity called a wavefunction.
这个方程的解法是,看起来像是写成数学符号就是,波函数。
The notion here is that you can get a globally optimal solution from locally optimal solutions to sub-problems.
这里的概念是你可以通过,子问题的局部最优方案,得到全局优化解决方案。
Suppose f of x, y, z equals k1, that is my equation, s1 and it gives me a solution s1.
假设我的方程是这样,然后给出了一个解。
So sometimes the extra solution is very interesting and you should always listen to the mathematics when you get extra solutions.
所以有时候这些增根的意义很耐人寻味,当你解出增根的时候,别忘了想一想它的数学含义
They're stuck to a surface that's provided by the environment that's around them, they're not swimming free in solution.
他们黏联在,周围环境的表面上,而不会在溶液中自由运动
And on Monday what we were discussing was the solution to the Schrodinger equation for the wave function.
周一我们讨论了,薛定谔方程解的波函数。
There is obviously no magic solution to this question but the best answer I know of is Socrates.
这个问题,没有神奇的解答,但我认为最佳的答案是苏格拉底。
As I see it, there is only one solution to all the foregoing difficulties.
在我看来,解决这种困境只有一个办法。
The solution to that might be a kind of amnesia, a kind of progressive lack of memory.
也许可以用健忘症来解决,一种持续的记忆缺失。
So actually, this is a winning solution.
所以,这实际上是个成功的解决方式。
But if you can accept the purity of the statement I just made, it is at the root of the thing you have a solution.
但如果你能够遵从原教旨主义的方式,那么这就是你解决此问题的根本
So in this case, the communication worked but am I right in thinking that the communication isn't such an instant solution as it was in the game we saw last time?
在这个博弈中,交流起到了作用,但是能说这和上一讲的博弈一样吗,交流并没能直接给出解决的方案
That's the whole point of the solution.
这就是那个方案的要点。
Why? Bundle of properties: mechanical strength, chemical inertness, ease of fabrication: that's not a unique solution.
为什么,属性的总和:,机械强度,化学惰性,易于制造,那不是独特的解决方法。
OK, so what have I done? I just added a little bit more now. I'm now running through a pair of loops. Again notice the encapsulation, that nice abstraction going on, which is what I want. Once I get to this stage though by the way, there might be more than one solution.
我现在运行了一对循环,再一次注意这个封装,抽象得很好,这就是我想要的结果,我按这种方式走到这一步的时候,可能会有多组答案。
STUDENT: So, how do you come to a conclusion as to which you should use then, if you can determine the size based on solution, or based on input, so how do you decide?
学生:所以,你怎样决定你该用,哪个来算呢?现在如果你可以选择是,基于解决方案的大小,还是基于输入的大小,你应该怎样决定呢?
应用推荐