And indeed, the question, strictly speaking, isn't even would life on the experience machine ? be better than it is now?
严格地说,我的问题,甚至不是说体验机器上的人生,难道不会比现在的更好吗?
So one answer to the question is why can't I give up my natural rights to life, liberty, and property is well, they're not, strictly speaking, yours.
第一个答案解释了为什么我们不能放弃,我们的生命,自由和财产权利,因为严格来说,它们不是自己的。
Strictly speaking, what I have just said isn't true.
严格来讲我刚才说的不对。
Strictly speaking, what do we mean when we say somebody is Greek?
那从严格意义上来说,什么样的人我们说才算是希腊人呢
These values are regarded by them as purely subjective again their own value judgment so to speak and not strictly speaking a part of the science of politics.
他们视这些价值观是纯粹主观的,可说是他们自身的价值判断,严格来说,并非,政治科学的一部份。
In some sense, strictly speaking they shouldn't be necessary because the fact that my specification starts with an assumption, says, hey you, who might call square root make sure that the things you call me with obey the assumption.
在某种意义上严格的来讲,它们不是必要的,因为我已经对假设做了声明,也就是说,如果你要调用我的,求平方根的函数,请确保你传递给我的,参数满足假设条件。
It's simpler, more straightforward to say instead, "What I am strictly speaking is a soul."
简单点儿,更直白地说,我严格的说起来就是个灵魂而已
Strictly speaking, I think we need to say the person just is the soul.
严格说来,我们得说,人即灵魂
But strictly speaking, we don't think it is literally a whole new person.
但严格说来,我们认为,她并不是一个新的物体。
Or perhaps, strictly speaking, what we should say is the only part that's essential to the person is the soul, though it's got a rather intimate connection to a particular body.
或者,严格地说来,我们可以表达为,灵魂是人最本质的部分,尽管它和肉体间保持着密切的联系
Or even if we say, "No. Strictly speaking, these people didn't die at all.
或者即使我们说,不,严格说来,这些人根本没死
Suppose we were to agree, all right, strictly speaking these people didn't die.
假设我们同意,严格说来这些人没有死
Now, strictly speaking, that doesn't prove that premise two is false.
严格的来说,这并不能证明前提二是错的
Or strictly speaking they didn't die, certainly at least, permanently.
或者严格说来 至少他们没有,永久地死去
Or perhaps strictly speaking just the soul.
又或者严格上来说只有灵魂。
They never, strictly speaking, died at all."
严格地说,他们从来就没死过
The person is, strictly speaking, the soul.
一个人,严格来讲,就是灵魂
It's natural to talk that way, but if we want belief in the soul to help us hold out the possibility at least that there might be life after death, then I think we need to actually say that strictly speaking, it's not that a person is a soul plus a body.
这说起来很轻松,如果我们想要寄托于,相信灵魂的存在,而让死后能够继续活着有据可依,那么我们需要一个严格的说法,不是说一个人是灵魂加肉体
The question was: Would it be plausible to say that at the early phases of A, strictly speaking,the body's not functioning, because it's so utterly dependent on help from the mother's body.
问题是,可否说在早期A阶段,严格地说,身体还未开始运作,因为其还依附于母体的帮助。
应用推荐