So basically, at the time he was just going on size and then traits, but what we actually know today is that we can also order things in the periodic table by electron configuration.
基本上,在当时他只能通过大小,和特性来进行,但是现在我们已经知道了,我们还可以通过电子排布来对它们进行排序。
Every regime will produce a distinctive kind of individual, and this individual will come to embody the dominant character traits of the particular regime.
每种政体都会催化,一种非常独特的个体,而此个体将会回过来,体现政体的显性特征。
In order to do that,we need to cultivate these traits.
为了达到这目的,我们需用心经营这些情感因素。
I'm putting Freud here but what I mean is well-known defenders of Freud will make some claims like: adult personality traits are shaped by the course of psychosexual development; all dreams are disguised wish fulfillment; psychoanalysis is the best treatment for mental disorders.
我虽然在这里说的是弗洛伊德,其实指的是那些著名的弗洛伊德的拥护者,他们会总结出这样的观点:,成年人的人格特质,是在性心理的发展过程中形成的;,所有的梦境都是愿望满足的伪装;,精神分析是治疗心理障碍的最佳手段。
He likened Charleston, South Carolina though this was in the 1780s he likened Charleston, South Carolina to what he called, quote, "The barbarous institutions and traits, especially slavery, the self-indulgence of the planters" and then he concludes "Just like Lima, Peru."
他把南卡罗来纳的查尔斯顿比作,那是在十八世纪八十年代,他把南卡罗来纳的查尔斯顿比作,"野蛮的制度和习性,尤其是奴隶制,种植园主们醉生梦死,自我放纵",然后他总结道,"就像秘鲁的利马一样"
Every regime shapes a common character a common character type with distinctive traits and qualities.
每一种政体都形塑出一种共同的性格,一种共同的性格类别,含带着独特的特征与特性。
Whatever form the best regime takes however it will always favor a certain kind of human being with a certain set of character traits.
然而,无论最优的政体是采取那种型式,它都将会永远偏袒某一群人,且会有一些特定的性格特征。
More specifically, what does it mean to say that an individual can be seen ? as magnified in his or her country, or that one's country is simply the collective expression of certain individual traits of character?
更确切地说,如果我们提到一个人,可以被视为是其国家的放大镜,那意谓着什么,或是某人的国家,就是特定,个人特征的集体呈现?
应用推荐