Just by comparison, official US government aid for developing countries, is currently 16 billion dollars.
相比之下,美国政府,对发展中国家的官方资助是160亿美元。
A lot of... I took US history, World history, AP Government.
还有好多……我还选了美国历史,世界历史,政治预科。
HOLC is no longer with us; it was actually set up as a temporary corporation by the government.
房主贷款公司已经不存在了,它事实上只是,一个政府临时设立的公司
The most excellent princes of the past were those like Moses, he tells us, who brought tables of law and prepared people for self-government.
历史上最杰出的君王是摩西那样的,他告诉我们,摩西带来了刻有法律的石板,而后让人们据此来自治。
In large part because our government has confused us about it, but it's a confusing question to know.
虽说很大程度上,是政府把这个问题变得复杂,但这个问题本身确实值得商榷
The libertarian says it may be a good thing if people wear seatbelts but that should be up to them and the state, the government, has no business coercing them, us, to wear seatbelts by law.
自由主义者说,系安全带也许是件好事,但这应由人们自己作主,政府没有资格,用法律来强迫人们系安全带。
We heard yesterday here at pond in Prinston, that the Parkistani government would like us to target other people, people who are leading the Taliban troops against their government rather than the people we want targeting who was leading the fighting in Afghnastan.
昨天我在普林斯顿的一个小湖边听到有人说,巴基斯坦政府想要我们去袭击其他人,那些反对政府的塔利班分子头目,而不是我们想要针对的人,这些人领导着阿富汗的斗争。
And now maybe...now I've just heard that maybe one of those two recessions wasn't even a classic recession at all So the question is 1890 to 1945 on the one hand, 1983 to the present on the other, does that tell us that ? we've gotten better at government interventions?
那么现在也许。。。就你们刚才所说,其中一次所谓的衰退也许,根本不能算是典型的经济衰退了,那么问题在于,从1890年到1945年,以及1983年至今的经济状况,是否说明,政府对经济的干预是有利的?
But Hobbes is best when he is providing us with, in many ways, the moral and psychological language in which we think about government and the state.
但当我们在构建国家和政府的时候,霍布斯却给了我们最好的答案,即道德和心理上的需求。
What the government would do is send someone over to the central bank and say -just lend us the money.
政府会做的是,派遣一个人到中央银行说,嘿,-给我们-借我们一些钱,hey,expand--give,us–
应用推荐