So in Joshua 23:7-8: ; "Do not utter the names of their gods or swear by them; do not serve them or bow down to them, but hold fast to the Lord your God as you have done this day."
在《约书亚书》23章7到8节中:,他们的神,你们不可提他的名,不可指着他起誓;,也不可事奉,叩拜,只要照着你们到今日所行的,专靠耶和华你们的神“
They're not bidden to be cast out in to utter darkness where there's weeping and gnashing of teeth.
没有因为无所事事而受惩罚,他们没有被罚去充满哭泣声和牙齿的无尽的黑暗里。
Think of all the insurrections or all the people who followed false czars to utter slaughter in Russia.
想想那些在俄罗斯追随,追随假沙皇起义的人们[对贵族]的屠杀
So creation in Genesis 1 is not described As a process of making something out of nothing: creation of something out of utter nothing.
因此在《创世纪》第一章中并没有描述开创,没有从虚无中创造事物的过程:,从完全的虚无中有所创造。
And Charles Darwin actually, who was an astute observer of human behavior, tells a nice story to illustrate this: how "a native touched with his finger some cold preserved meat and plainly showed disgust at its softness whilst I felt utter disgust at my food being touched by a naked savage though his hands did not appear dirty."
达尔文,对人类行为观察入微,他有一个故事很好地解释了反感:,“一个土著用手指碰冷腌肉,那种软软的质地让他感到很反感,而让我感无无比反感的是我的食物,被一个没穿衣取的土著碰了,虽然他的手不脏“
It's just this kind of rhetorical trick that Milton uses - so many rhetorical tricks like this that Milton will use throughout the poem -- that led Dr. Johnson to say in utter exasperation, but admiration, that "Milton wrote no language": this isn't English that Milton is writing here.
正是弥尔顿使用的这种修辞手法,-弥尔顿全诗使用了大量这样的修辞手法,-让约翰逊博士懊恼而又钦佩的说,“弥尔顿所写不是语言“,弥尔顿这里写的不是英语。
And why the claim of the utter destruction of the Canaanites when evidence points to close Canaanite origins? This practice, which I mentioned before and is known as herem or the ban, is not unique to Israel. I know some of you have studied it in sections you looked at the inscription of King Mesha, King Mesha of Moab.
那为何要声称迦南彻底的毁灭呢?,当证据指出了迦南的起源,这一习俗,也就是我之前提到的禁忌或祭祀,并不是以色列独有的,我想你们也已经学过,你们看摩押米沙王的题词,摩押的米沙王。
应用推荐