Now,the problem with this is that Papias and these other people didn't really know what they were talking about.
问题是帕皮亚和其他人,根本不知道自己在说什么。
the fact that the only problem you're having is the lack of what your expressing and need for.
事实上,你唯一的问题就是你缺少或需要的东西仍未被满足。
In fact,so what we see is,the body theory is in exactly the same problem, exactly the same situation,as the personality theory.
事实上,从我们所见能得出,肉体理论,和人格理论具有一样的问题和情况。
Another part of the problem of learning language is you have to figure out what the boundaries are between the words.
学习语言的另一个问题是,你必须得确定单词之间的界线是什么
It implies that this algorithm is calling itself again and again, and again, and on each time the size of the problem I'm trying to sort is being divided by what?
这就说明此算法会一次又一次地调用自己,每次我要排序的问题规模大小,会除以多少呢?
bug What I typically do is I start with the input that provoked the problem, and I keep making it smaller and smaller.
我这里做的就是从引起,出现的输入开始,然后将输入,一步步的缩小规模。
Even so experimental a book as John Barth's Lost in the Funhouse is totally absorbed in the problem of what it would mean to write about yourself.
就算约翰,巴思的《迷失在游乐场》这么一部实验小说,也在专注一个问题,就是写关于自己经历的意义。
d1 2 3 And we can do that just going along, 3 d 1, 2 3, and the problem comes when we get to chromium here, which is instead of what we would expect, 4s23d4 we might expect to see 4 s 2, 3 d 4.
我们能做的就是继续,问题出现了,当我们来到铬元素时,它不是我们预期的那样,我们可能预期。
This is what I want you to think about on the Problem Set.
这也是习题册上的一道思考题
Well it kind of depends on what you think is driving the problem, and each of these things suggest a different level, different types of things you might do.
这取决于你对产生这个问题的原因的理解,不同的理解决定着你可以采取的,行动的层次和方式
The problem is what Patrick said.
就像帕特里克说的
What is the problem?
出什么问题了?
I'm going to give the last class a problem which is pretty interesting, which is what happens to you when you have an elevator.
我将讲解最后一个例题,非常有趣,也就是当你在电梯里的情形
These are going to be fairly common-sense definitions, but they're important, and when you get to a problem set, really nailing down what the system is, not more, nor less, in terms of the amount of stuff, that's part of the system, it's going to be often very crucial.
这些是,很常识性的定义,但是很重要,当你要解决问题时,务必要搞清楚系统是什么,它包含多少物质,不能多也不能少,这往往,是非常重要的。
But much of the exchange with Thrasymachus turns on the problem of what kind of knowledge justice involves, and justice is a kind of knowledge.
而与,Thrasymachus,交锋,所激发出的问题是,何种知识是正义所包含,及正义是一种知识。
And more generally, the problem is you can talk about what other people do in terms of reinforcement and punishment and operant conditioning and classical conditioning.
更加一般性的问题便是,你可以用强化和惩罚,操作性条件作用,以及经典条件作用之类的术语,来解释他人的行为。
The problem is Freud had a very sort of hydraulic theory of what goes on, and some of this stuff slips out and it shows up in dreams and it shows up in slips of the tongue.
问题在于,弗洛伊德用所谓的液压理论,解释了发生的事情,有些受到压抑的欲望,会通过梦境和口误而表现出来。
.. The problem is again the ideal-- they're trying to work toward what I think of an ideal that we see in finance-- 1 mainly, the perfect correlation of consumption and the elimination of risk--we all help each other.
问题又回到了理想-,他们为之奋斗的这种理想状态,如果用金融学的理念来解读-,就是消费与风险消除的相关系数为,即完全正相关,所有人都互助互利。
What we really want to worry about is, as the size of the problem gets larger, how does this thing grow? How does the cost go up?
随着问题规模的变大,解决问题花费的代价是怎么增长的,因此我们将会主要地讲讲?
But let's look for a slight variant of it, where greedy is not so good. And that's what's called the zero-one knapsack problem.
但是让我们找一找它的一些变种,在这些变种中贪婪算法用处不大,这些问题也就是0/1背包问题。
So one of the things I didn't say, it's sort of implicit here, is what is the thing I measuring the size of the problem in?
我有一点没有提及,这有点含蓄,这一点就是我怎么,来度量输入问题的大小呢?,一个数组的大小怎么来定义呢?
The second question I want to ask is what's the base case? When do I get down to a problem that's small enough that it's basically trivial to solve? Here it was lists of size one. I could have stopped at lists of size two right. That's an easy comparison.
第二个问题是什么是基础条件?,我要将问题分解到何时才使得问题,小到可以解决的基本问题?,这里是当列表的长度为1有时候,我也可以在长度为2的时候停止分解,那是一个非常简单的对比。
Spelling. These are just dumb little things to look for. Did you spell all the identifiers the way you think you did. The problem is, when you read code you see what you expect to see.
拼写错误,你可能得找找这些粗心的小错误,你是否拼对了标识符,问题是当你阅读代码的时候,你看到的都是你以为的。
应用推荐