And what you might have noted is although we described how to make predictions about these properties, I didn't talk too much about what it actually means, what the ramifications of these different properties are.
而大家可能已经注意到了我们描述了,如何对这些性质进行预言,但是我并没有讲这到底有什么意义,这些不同性质的分支是什么。
There are only three assignments: two six-page papers, that I'll explain how to do. One is a exegesis paper, and we'll spend a whole section discussion talking about what we mean by exegesis and teaching you how to do it.
有三项作业:2篇6页论文,我会讲具体要求的,一篇是注释论文,我们花一整节讨论课,讲什么是注释,如何写注释论文。
I was curious; I was even a user assistant at the time, I was certainly a geek at the time and yet I had no sense really of what actually went on in a classroom like this.
我很好奇,在当时我是一名助教,那时我肯定是一个怪胎,我真的不知道,这样的课上讲的是什么东西。
He mentioned the Nicomachean Ethics which I have never read I don't know what that is.
他提到了《尼各马克伦理学》,一本我从没读过的书,我不知道那本书是讲什么的。
What are your questions? Yes.
你们的问题是什么,请讲
The second question I've hinted at that are about to turn to not literally turn to the moment but shortly I'll turn to is what's the relevant glue what makes two stages ? stages of the very same thing?
第二个要讨论的问题是,虽然我们还没讲到,但等一下会讲,让两个不同的阶段,成为同一样东西的,是什么粘合物?
Sabbath Lily But what I want to take out of Sabbath Lily's comment about Haze is this sense of what you look at.
但我对于,对Haze的评价中需要挑出来讲的是,“你在看什么“的含义。
If de Broglie is correct, let's irradiate the nickel crystal with a beam of electrons where the wavelength of the beam of electrons is identical to the wavelength of the x-rays that were used and see what we get.
如果德·布罗意是正确的,那么镍晶体放出,电子光束,电子束的波长,和原来讲过的X光的波长是相等的,再看看得到了什么。
What Siegel emphasized--the book is really about this-- he talks about what is the expected return of stocks and what is the expected return of bonds and so on.
西格尔强调的是。。。这书真正讲的是-,他讨论了什么是股票预期投资收益,以及什么是预期投资债券等等内容。
This time I'm not just saying --% 2f "%f" I'm actually saying % -- what -- %.2f.
这次我不只是讲“%f“,我要讲的是,%,--什么呢。
应用推荐