First of all, happiness is a positive sum game-- it's not a zero sum game.

首先，快乐是正和游戏-,不是零和游戏。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

It's not even a zero-- or rather if I have less, you'll have less- that's a negative sum game-- or a zero sum game-- if I have more, you'll have less- it's a fixed pie.

甚至不是一个零…,或者我更少，你也会更少，那也是负和游戏-,或零和游戏，我更多，你就会更少-,饼就那么大。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

So, the total work that we can get out must be zero, out of the whole sum of them.

因此，我们可以从这两个热机,得到的总功，一定是零。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

So,after taking into account the market impact, and the commissions,and the fees, this zero-sum game becomes a negative-sum game.

所以,考虑到市场冲击,佣金,规费,这一零和博弈变成了负和博弈

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

I am going to say if that electron is to stay in its orbit, that is to say it doesn't flee the atom, it doesn't collapse under the nucleus then the sum of the forces on the electron must be zero No net force. And so that will be the sum of a dynamic force plus an electrostatic.

如果电子会保持在它的轨道上运行,既不脱离原子的话，它就不会由于原子核对它的吸引力而被瓦解掉,电子所受的合力一定为零,由于没有合力,所以电子所受力为动态力和静电力的总和。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

In the language, if I can switch to the language of modern economics, one could say that for Thrasymachus politics is a zero-sum game.

换个领域的词汇，让我用现代经济学的话来说，这可能将，Thrasymachus，式的政治,喻成一场零和游戏。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

We've already talked about how security selection is a zero-sum game.

我们已经讨论过,证券选择是个零和博弈

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

If security selection is a zero-sum game, the amount by which the winner wins equals the amount by which the loser loses -winners and losers being defined by performance after a security selection that has been made -well, that sounds like a zero-sum game.

如果证券选择是一个零和博弈,赢方赚得的金额,等于输方赔付的金额,谁赢谁输取决于,双方投资在证券选择后的表现,这听起来确实像个零和博弈

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选