Ephesians was written by a different disciple of Paul, and he was using as his model for a Pauline letter the actual letters of Paul, or at least some of them that he possessed and knew of.
以弗所书则由保罗的另一信徒执笔,他伪造保罗的书信,模板是保罗的书信,或者他所持有的一些保罗的书信。
We know very well, by the way, that there are scientists who simply cannot stand to read poetry because it's false, right?
我们清楚的知道,有些科学家,不能忍受诗歌因为他们认为诗歌是伪造的?
And if this myth of origins were the fabrication of a later writer, then surely they would have written the story in such a way as to give their ancestors a less tenuous hold or claim, connection, to the land.
如果这个神话的开端是后世作者伪造的,那他们当然会像这样在故事中赋予其祖先较强的控制力,或者说所有权,建立其与这片土地较为紧密的联系。
So Paul's letters were being imitated, new ones were being written,and they were being circulated.
所以保罗的书信被伪造了,新的书信被书写并传阅。
You don't publish results that you've faked.
你不用发表你伪造的结果。
And what an agonist does is increases the effect of neurotransmitters, either by making more neurotransmitters or stopping the cleanup of neurotransmitters, or in some cases by faking a neurotransmitter, by mimicking its effects.
兴奋剂会增加神经递质的作用效果,有可能是通过释放更多的神经递质而实现,也可能是通过阻止神经递质的排出而实现,也有时候是通过伪造神经递质,通过模仿神经递质的效果来实现的
So notice this guy, another guy sort of forging another letter by Paul.
所以这个人。。。,另一个人伪造了一封保罗的书信。
Just as Richards says, there's always something kind of archaic or atavistic about poetic thinking. It's not just that - it's not trying to tell the truth, as Sidney said-- "nothing lieth because it never affirmeth."
就像Richards说的,关于诗意的思考,总有些事情过时了,诗歌并非,拒绝陈述事实,正如Sidney说的-,“没有伪造的东西因为一切都不是真的“
应用推荐