Cause and effect, that becomes uncertain, too.
因果关系也变得不确定。
There's this very tight causal connection between the body and the mind and the soul and the body, the body and the soul.
有种非常紧密的,因果关系存在于肉体和思想,灵魂和肉体,或是肉体和灵魂之中
Cause and effect below a certain level of definition is blurred.
在某种程度的定义的下的,因果关系是模糊的。
People anchor to the information they were given, even though there's kind of no causality or no sort of reason why it should make any difference.
人们总是停留在他们已经被给予的信息上,即使他们之间没有因果关系,或者没有任何原因表明这种信息会有任何影响。
In many ways, he's not making a causal claim so much.
但他并没有,强力主张因果关系。
Cause and effect, buddy, cause and effect.
因果关系,巴蒂,因果关系。
Where a historian might simply record events that is such a simple thing to do, but let's go with that for a moment) a historian might simply record events, however selectively or partially, ; might try to indicate cause and effect where possible; but a historiosophy is a more conscious philosophy of history.
历史学家好像仅仅记录事件,就好像,这是一件极简单的事,但我们要继续研究一下),历史学家可能仅仅记录事件但是有选择的,部分的,可能试图在某些地方表明因果关系;,但是历史哲学家对历史中体现的哲学更明了。
Adiabatic q equal to zero. It's also delta H 0 which is zero. The two didn't necessarily follow because remember, delta H is dq so p is only true for a reversible constant pressure process.
在这个过程中ΔH等于,绝热的所以q等于0,而ΔH也等于,这两个也不一定有因果关系,因为,记住,ΔH等于dq只有在恒压。
Now, you know, when we've got our deterministic hats on, we think to ourselves, "There's got to be some underlying causal explanation, some feature about the break-down atoms that explains why they broke down and that was missing from the non-break-down atoms that explains why they don't break down.
现在,你知道,当我们用决定论的观点去分析这个问题时,我们自己寻思着,这背后一定有某种具有,因果关系的解释,某种关于分裂原子的特性,能解释为什么它们分裂了,而由于这种特性不存在于未分裂的原子,因而解释了它们为什么不能分裂
B has to be caused by something and A happened first, so they assign causality.
如果B真的因为某些事情而发生了,而A又在之前发生,所以他们刻意安排这种因果关系。
应用推荐