-
In other words, language, according to Derrida, in the Saussurian tradition seems to privilege sound over script, over what is graphic.
换句话说，德里达认为，在索绪尔的理论中，音响比文字，更具优势。
-
Derrida, as I said, believes in a kind of seamless web of discourse or discursivity. We are awash in discourse.
德里达，我说过，他相信有一种无缝的网,存在于论述或推论中，我们在论述中是处于同一水平线的。
-
take a look at page 917, the left-hand column, where Derrida is talking not about Levi-Strauss but about Saussure.
看一下第917页，左边，这里德里达不是在说列维而是在说索绪尔。
-
Derrida, I think, freely acknowledges in this essay the degree to which he is standing on Levi-Strauss's shoulders.
在我看来，德里达在这篇论文中，声明了,自己在何种程度上借鉴了列维的观点。
-
All right. There a couple of things that I want to say about the key moves of Derrida.
好，我还想说一些,德里达的重要举动。
-
Now I want to pause a little bit more, then, in this regard over Derrida's distinction between writing and speech--writing, ecriture.
现在我想再停下来花一点儿时间讲讲,德里达的书写和演讲之间的区别，书写，文字。
-
This is what Levi-Strauss says in taken from one of Levi-Strauss' most famous books] The Raw and the Cooked.
然后德里达说，这是列维自己说的,引自列维斯最著名的著作之一],《生食与熟食》
-
So here's what, a little more than halfway down, the left-hand column, page 917, Derrida has to say about that.
所以这里，中部偏下，第917页左边，德里达说出了自己关于它的看法。
-
So those are some remarks then on the differences and the similarities between de Man and Derrida.
关于德曼与德里达之间的,不同点和相同点，我要讲的就那些。
-
There is a self-consciousness in the thinking about structure that we find in many places in Levi-Strauss that Derrida freely acknowledges in his essay.
在列维的作品中,我们能找到多处对结构认识的自觉,德里达在自己的论文中也承认了这种自觉的正确性。
-
You've read all of one essay and you've read part of another, "Differance," and you've found him very difficult.
一整篇论文和另一篇论文的一部分，《延异》，大家已经发现了，德里达的作品很难懂。
-
So this is Levi-Strauss' argument, and Derrida is interested in it because he recognizes its affinity with his own hesitation in talking about events, births, emergence and so on.
这就是列维，施特劳斯的论点，而德里达对此感兴趣是因为他意识到它与自己的犹豫类同,他在谈论语言的发展，诞生和危机等东西时的犹豫。
-
Derrida is aware of it in advance. He says in effect, "Look, I know we're running this risk in saying everything is language," or, if you will here, everything is discourse.
德里达提前意识到了这一点，他说，“我就知道将一切都说成是语言是冒险的“,或者，如果你愿意，一切都是言语。
-
Suppose Archie Bunker were Jacques Derrida, and Jacques Derrida came along and said, "What is the differance?"
假设阿齐，邦克是雅克，德里达，雅克，德里达走过来说，区别在哪“
-
The argument Derrida is making about the emergence of his "event" is that a new transcendental signified has actually substituted itself for man.
德里达有关他的“事件“产生的论点是“,新的超验所,指已经取代了人类。
-
Derrida famously, notoriously, said "there is nothing outside the text," right? What he meant by that, of course, is that there's nothing but text.
德里达著名地，恶名昭彰地，说道，文本之外什么都没有“,是吧，当然，他意思就是说，需要考虑的只有文本。
-
A center is both a center and not a center, as Derrida maddeningly tells us.
中心既是中心又不是中心，德里达令人恼火地这样告诉我们。
-
I'd like to start with a little more discussion of Derrida before we turn to de Man.
首先我想再谈谈德里达,然后再讨论德曼。
-
Derrida is claiming that language is different in the sense that it makes no sense to talk about it as standing outside of what's going on.
德里达称语言是不同的,因为站在语言之外谈论发生了什么是没有意义的。
-
This then is an introductory moment in Derrida's thinking about centers.
这是对德里达关于中心的想法的介绍。
-
This is a metaphor that Derrida frequently uses, as a kind of writing on the ear.
这是德里达经常用的一个比喻，就像在耳朵上书写。
-
I have a tendency to put upon texts an inherent authority which is stronger, I think, than Derrida is willing to put on them.
我倾向于把一个固有的权威,放在文本之上，这个权威，我想，比德里达愿意放置的更强大。
-
He follows Jakobson much more consistently in this regard than Derrida does.
他与雅各布森意见一致,在这个方面比德里达与雅各布森的意见更加一致。
-
It's simply a distinction that can't be maintained, which is why he calls it an "event."
这个差别不容忽视，这就是为什么德里达称语言为事件“
-
Metonymy is the delay or perpetual, as we gathered also from Derrida, differance of signification.
转喻具有那种延期和永恒的特质，这也是我们从法国人，德里达那本《书写与差异》的书中看出来的。
-
What happened subsequently can, I think, be traced to Derrida's lecture.
我认为之后的事，可以追溯到德里达的演讲。
-
Now I do want to go back to the relationship between Derrida and Levi-Strauss.
现在我想回到,德里达和列维，施特劳斯之间的关系。
-
In saying that, I want to move immediately to the differences with Derrida.
说到这点，我想快速地转到德里达的不同点。
-
Derrida was, of course, a central figure in this.
德里达当然是这其中的一个重要人物。
-
It deploys and manipulates those gross constituent units of thought in the ways that we saw, but notice what Levi-Strauss is saying in that essay as opposed to the passage Derrida has just quoted.
它通过我们看到的方式来,调动和使用那些大构成单位，但请注意列维在这篇文章里所说的,与德里达引用的，形成了鲜明的对比。
应用推荐