Everyone is an enforcer or what Locke calls " "the executor"of the state of nature and he means executor literally.
每个人都是执行者,或洛克说的,自然法的“执刑者,这个“执刑者“可以字面上理解。
.. Yes. By Locke's definition, you can say... So maybe by Locke's definition, the Native Americans could have claimed a property right in the land itself.
是的,按照洛克的定义,你可以说。,也许按照洛克的定义,印第安人可以宣称拥有对该土地的财产权。
Achilles or Patroclus, or whoever is on his chariot, is driving.
阿喀琉斯,或普特洛克勒斯,或任何在战车上的人
Individuals of heterodox belief but whose own views may stimulate others to question and think for themselves, all to the good, Milton, John Locke, people like Voltaire argued something like this.
如苏格拉底持非正统信念的个体,他们的观点,可能激励其它人反省,及内思,所有的好人,米尔顿,洛克及像伏尔泰等人,都做过类似的申辩。
It comes out of Locke and those folks.
它最早出自于洛克那些人
Like, you're accusing him of justifying the European basically massacre of the Native Americans.
你指责洛克正义化了欧洲殖民者,屠杀印第安人的行为。
If you look at the syllabus, you'll notice that we read a number of great and famous books, books by Aristotle, John Locke, Immanuel Kant, John Stewart Mill, and others.
如果你有留意教学大纲,就能发现,教学大纲里列出了不少人的著作,包括亚里士多德,约翰·洛克,伊曼努尔·康德,约翰·斯图尔特·穆勒及其他哲学家的著作。
Sometimes, when the ideas of political philosophers are as familiar as Locke's ideas about consent, it's hard to make sense of them or at least to find them very interesting.
有时当一些政治哲学家对同意的看法,与洛克非常相似时,都让人很难理解,或至少不会觉得很有趣。
Because if you are right that this would justify the taking of land in North America from Native Americans who didn't enclose it, if it's a good argument, then Locke's given us a justification for that.
因为如果你是对的,洛克此举将正义化从印第安人手中占领,他们尚未圈定的土地这一行为,如果他的观点是正确的,那么洛克给出了占领土地的正当理由。
The fact is that there are still people in the world many people who regard themselves as Aristotelians Thomists Lockeans Kantians even the occasional Marxist can still be found in Ivy League universities.
事实上,世界上仍有人,很多人自认是亚里士多德学派,托马斯神学派,洛克学派,康德学派,甚至偶尔,还会发现马克斯学派,存在于长春藤联盟的大学中。
应用推荐