Suppose we conjecture that the only thing intrinsically valuable is pleasure and the only thing intrinsically bad is pain.

假设我们推测出唯一,拥有固有价值的东西是快乐,唯一一样自身是坏的东西是痛苦。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

We asked them to identify themselves and identify themselves not only in terms of the worth they were doing but the capabilities they might bring to the group as a whole.

我们要求他们,给自己定位,不仅从自身价值的角度,而且从能为整个组,做出多少贡献的角度。

麻省理工公开课 - 媒体、教育、市场课程节选

The things that are worth having for their own sake, " philosophers call intrinsically valuable.

因为自身的品质而值得拥有的，哲学家称为“固有价值。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

These values are regarded by them as purely subjective again their own value judgment so to speak and not strictly speaking a part of the science of politics.

他们视这些价值观是纯粹主观的,可说是他们自身的价值判断,严格来说，并非,政治科学的一部份。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

A corporation is an entity that could be sued or could lose more money than it's worth, but the value of a corporation can never fall below zero to the investors because the investors are not liable for the mistakes of the corporation.

公司是一个实体,它可能被起诉,或者亏损额超过了自身的价值,但是对于投资者而言,公司的价值永远不会小于零,因为投资者对公司的过失,不负有责任

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

It's a way to avoid the argument; although, for what it's worth, I should mention I don't myself believe that it's false that we have free will.

这是回避这条论证的一种方法,尽管这条论证有它自身的价值,应该说,我个人认为,人有自由意志,并没有错

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Aristotle takes his stand from within politics and the regime of which he is a part. Of course we all know contemporary political scientists are not neutral. They frequently insert their views values we call them value judgments we call them.

亚里士多德的立场却是置身于,政治与政体之内,让自己成为其中的一部份，当然,我们都知道当今的政治科学,并非如此中立，他们常硬加入,他们自身的观点与价值，他们的价值判断。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

What things are worth having for their own sake, whether or not those things also have instrumental value, What things are worth having for their own sake ? and what things are worth avoiding for their own sake?

什么东西是因其自身品质而值得拥有，不管它们是否有利用价值，什么东西是因其自身品质而值得拥有,什么东西是因其自身品质而应避免？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选