Results: The clinic efficacy of pueraria group was better than that of control group (P<0.05).
结果：葛根素组的治疗效果优于对照组（P<0.05）。
There were no significant differences between each operation group and control group (P< 0.05).
各手术组正常侧与对照组相比差异无显著性意义（P>0.05）。
While CF in SOD Mimic group was lower than in control group (P<0.05).
再灌注后模拟酶组CF偏低，与对照组比较有显著性差异（P<0。 05）。
RESULTS The effects of the treatment group were significantly better than the control, P<0.01.
结果推拿二步八法的治疗组疗效明显优于对照组，P<0.01。
Result:The total effective rate was 80% in treatment group and 67% in control group, P< 0.05.
结果治疗组有效率为80%，对照组有效率为67%（P<0.05）。 结论疏肝活血利水法治疗难治性青光眼有显著疗效。
There is significant difference between the observation group and control group (P< 0.01).
观察组与对照组大鱼际掌纹形态分级之间有极为显著性差异（P<0.01）。
The resorption in test group was significantly lower than in control group (P<0.001).
实验组平均骨量吸收程度显著低于对照组（P<0.001）。
But the difference was not significant(P>0.05)as compared with the control group (pseudo-operation group).
和假手术对照组相比，差异无显著性意义（P>0.05）。
The effective rate was 94.1% with significant difference (P<0.01) compared with the control group.
治疗组总有效率为94.1%，与对照组比较有显著性差异（P＜0.01）。
Results The total effective rate was 94.2% in treatment group and 78.1% in control group(P<0.05).
结果治疗组总有效率为94.2%，对照组为78.1%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。
Results: Compared with control group, the total effective rate increased significantly in treatment group (P<0.05).
结果：与对照组相比，治疗组有效率显著增高， 差异具有显著性意义（P < 0。 05）。
Results:The total effective rate was 90% in treatment group and 60% in control group, P<0.05.
结果：治疗组总有效率90 % ，对照组总有效率60 % （P< 0 .0 5 ）。 提示虫草二至丸对单纯性肾小球性血尿有效。
Results: The effective rates of treatment group and control group were 95% and 82%(P< 0.01), respectively.
结果：治疗组的总有效率95%，对照组总有效率为82%（P<0.01）。
Medicine compliance in study group was higher than that of control group(P<0.01).
研究组服药依从性高于对照组，有显著性差异（P＜0.01）；
The negative nitrogen balance of control group was more seriously than PN group(P<0.05).
术后PN支持组的负氮平衡改善较常规补液组明显（P＜0.05）。
The tolerance of treatment group was better than the control group (P<0.05).
治疗组的耐受性优于对照组（P<0.05）。
Dosage of glonoine every day:treatment group was low dose compared with control group (P<0.01).
每日硝酸甘油用量：治疗组少于对照组（P< 0 0 1）。
Results:The treatment group increase in immunity obviously better than the control group(P<0.05);
结果：治疗组在提高机体免疫力方面明显优于对照组（P＜0.05）。
Results Delivery pregnancy week in study group was lower than that in control group(P<0.05).
结果观察组分娩孕周低于对照组（P< 0 0 5 ）。
The total effective rate in treatment group was than the control group(P<0.01).
治疗组总有效率优于对照组（P<0.01）。
The effect has significant difference compared with that of the control group(P<0.01 , P<0.05).
与对照组相比有显著性差异（P＜0.01，P＜0.05）。
The treatment group was better than the control group (P<0.05).
治疗组优于对照组（P<0.05）。
The temperature reiteration rate was lower in head temperature control instrument group (P< 0.01).
体温反复者以颅脑降温治疗仪最低（P<0.01）；
The effects of therapy group were significantly better than that in control group, P<0.05.
治疗组与对照组比较治疗组效果明显优于对照组，差异有显著性，P<0.05。
Results:The efficacy was significantly better in treatment group than in control group(P<0.05).
结果：治疗组明显优于对照组（P<0.05）。
Result Symptoms of the experimental group were obviously improved compared with the control group(P<0.05).
结果治疗组与对照组比较，突发性聋症状改善更显著（P<0.05）。
Result Symptoms of the experimental group were obviously improved compared with the control group(P<0.05).
结果治疗组与对照组比较，突发性聋症状改善更显著（P<0.05）。
应用推荐