This fine-grained control is not in P: : RD, which offers only one level of commit.
在P：RD中并没有这样细粒度(fine - grained)的控制，它只提供了一个层次上的提交。
The two therapeutics have no statistical different in control tumour focus (P>0.05).
中药组与中药加化疗组在抑制肿瘤病灶方面无统计学差异（P>0.05）。
Results: The clinic efficacy of pueraria group was better than that of control group (P<0.05).
结果：葛根素组的治疗效果优于对照组（P<0.05）。
There were no significant differences between each operation group and control group (P< 0.05).
各手术组正常侧与对照组相比差异无显著性意义（P>0.05）。
There was significant difference between experimental and control groups (P< 0. 01).
经统计学分析，两组间差异有极显著性（P＜0．01）。
RESULTS The effects of the treatment group were significantly better than the control, P<0.01.
结果推拿二步八法的治疗组疗效明显优于对照组，P<0.01。
The content of NO in CPHwas lower than that in negative control(P< 0.05).
慢性持续性肝炎组的NO水平则低于正常对照组（P<0.05）。
Tropisetron was superior to ondansetron in the complete control rate(P<0.05).
但完全控制率托烷司琼优于昂丹司琼（P<0.05）。
But the difference was not significant(P>0.05)as compared with the control group (pseudo-operation group).
和假手术对照组相比，差异无显著性意义（P>0.05）。
None of the control mice had P. carinii infection.
未给予激素的对照组小鼠无一感染卡氏肺孢子虫。
While CF in SOD Mimic group was lower than in control group (P<0.05).
再灌注后模拟酶组CF偏低，与对照组比较有显著性差异（P<0。 05）。
Result:The total effective rate was 80% in treatment group and 67% in control group, P< 0.05.
结果治疗组有效率为80%，对照组有效率为67%（P<0.05）。 结论疏肝活血利水法治疗难治性青光眼有显著疗效。
There is significant difference between the observation group and control group (P< 0.01).
观察组与对照组大鱼际掌纹形态分级之间有极为显著性差异（P<0.01）。
The temperature reiteration rate was lower in head temperature control instrument group (P< 0.01).
体温反复者以颅脑降温治疗仪最低（P<0.01）；
But by 7 p. m., my self-control mechanism was worn out, and down those cookies went.
到了晚上七点，我的自控机制已经磨损，于是那些甜饼就没了。
Results The clinical effective rate of Sang Cba was 89.4%while the control group was 68.3%(P<0.01).
结果桑茶的总有效率为89.4％，对照组为68.3％。两组疗效有显著差异（P<0.01）。
The resorption in test group was significantly lower than in control group (P<0.001).
实验组平均骨量吸收程度显著低于对照组（P<0.001）。
Results: The total effective rates were 72.2% and 67.6% in dexzopiclone and control group (P>0.05).
结果：治疗组和对照组总有效率分别为72.2%和 67.6%，组间比较无显著差异（P＞0.05）。
Result:The total effective rate in the treatment and the control group was 89.3% and 64.3%respectively(P<0.05).
结果：治疗组总有效率89.3%，对照组总有效率64.3%，两组比较有显著性差异（P＜0.05）；
The duration of ICU stay was shorter than the control group(P<0.01).
治疗组ICU住院时间明显短于对照组（P<0.01）。
Medicine compliance in study group was higher than that of control group(P<0.01).
研究组服药依从性高于对照组，有显著性差异（P＜0.01）；
Results The total effective rate was 94.2% in treatment group and 78.1% in control group(P<0.05).
结果治疗组总有效率为94.2%，对照组为78.1%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。
The effective rate was 94.1% with significant difference (P<0.01) compared with the control group.
治疗组总有效率为94.1%，与对照组比较有显著性差异（P＜0.01）。
The negative nitrogen balance of control group was more seriously than PN group(P<0.05).
术后PN支持组的负氮平衡改善较常规补液组明显（P＜0.05）。
Results: Compared with control group, the total effective rate increased significantly in treatment group (P<0.05).
结果：与对照组相比，治疗组有效率显著增高， 差异具有显著性意义（P < 0。 05）。
Results:The total effective rate was 90% in treatment group and 60% in control group, P<0.05.
结果：治疗组总有效率90 % ，对照组总有效率60 % （P< 0 .0 5 ）。 提示虫草二至丸对单纯性肾小球性血尿有效。
Results:The total effective rate was 90% in treatment group and 60% in control group, P<0.05.
结果：治疗组总有效率90 % ，对照组总有效率60 % （P< 0 .0 5 ）。 提示虫草二至丸对单纯性肾小球性血尿有效。
应用推荐