Why these "big bangs" then and not at other times?
为什么这些“大爆炸”的话，而不是在其他时间呢？
We haven't seen it up close because Big Bangs aren't something that occur every day.
我们无法近距离地观察到时间开始之初的样子，因为大爆炸并不是每天都会发生的事情。
Neutron stars are, after all, a little less extreme than black holes, Big Bangs and supernovae…
毕竟中子星并没有黑洞、大爆炸、超新星等等那么极端。
Never mind big bangs and blazing machine guns - in a Tarantino film, this is where the action is.
不要去想什么大轰炸，机关枪扫射的场景——在塔伦蒂诺的片子里，对话才是演戏。
Neutron stars are, after all, a little less extreme than black holes, Big Bangs and supernovae...
毕竟中子星并没有黑洞、大爆炸、超新星等等那么极端。
When they collide, they release so much energy that physicists often refer to the lead-lead collisions as "micro-Big Bangs."
当它们碰撞时，它们释放的能量强大到物理学家们常常会将铅——铅对撞成为“微型宇宙大爆炸”。
In fact, these fleeting micro-Big Bangs will generate the hottest temperatures yet, replicating the temperature conditions just after the Big Bang.
事实上，这些转瞬即逝的微型大爆炸将产生迄今为止最高的温度，重现大爆炸之后瞬间的温度情形。
The standard big bang theory says the universe began with a massive explosion but the new theory suggests it is a cyclic event that consists of repeating big bangs.
标准的大霹雳理论认为，宇宙起始于一次巨大的爆炸，但新的理论认为是连续的大霹雳形成一个周期的事件。
These "big bangs" in plant evolution occurred when the genomes of ancient plants duplicated, providing vast Numbers of new genes that could take on new functions and lead to new traits.
这种植物种群数量的“大爆炸”是在古代植物染色体组加倍时发生的。染色体组加倍给植物提供了大量具有新功能的基因，这些新基因又形成了新特性。
We associate black holes, Big Bangs and supernovae with extreme astrophysics and mind-boggling destructive energies, so obviously scientists can't really build the genuine article in a lab.
我们将黑洞、大爆炸和超新星与极端的天体物理学和令人难以置信的能量联系起来，所以很显然科学家们并不能在实验室里真正地把它们制造出来。
We associate black holes, Big Bangs and supernovae with extreme astrophysics and mind-boggling destructive energies, so obviously scientists can't really build the genuine article in a lab.
我们将黑洞、大爆炸和超新星与极端的天体物理学和令人难以置信的能量联系起来，所以很显然科学家们并不能在实验室里真正地把它们制造出来。
应用推荐