The regulation of the anticipatory breach of contract is one of the highlights in the Contract Law.
预期违约制度是《合同法》的亮点之一。
This system is slightly different from the anticipatory breach of contract system of the Anglo law.
它与英美法的预期违约制度有一定的差异。
In the civil law, it is embodied in the right for unstable counterplea, in Anglo-American law it is reflected in the right for the anticipatory breach of contract.
在大陆法系体现为不安抗辩权制度，在英美法系则体现为预期违约制度。
The new contract law common law countries, drawing on the contract system, the system provides for anticipatory breach of contract.
新合同法借鉴英美法系国家的合同制度，规定了预期违约制度。
Chapter one is the summarization of the system of Anticipatory breach of contract, expound mainly the concept, origination and value of this system.
本文的第一章是预期违约的概述，主要阐述了预期违约的概念，起源及预期违约的制度价值。
This thesis points out the limitations on the legislation of The New Contract Law anticipatory breach system. It also analyses the cause of these limitations and answers of solution.
本文通过与国外合同立法的对比，指出了新合同法预期违约制度立法上的不足，分析其产生原因，并提出了解决办法。
Therefore, this paper tents to detail the regime of anticipatory breach of contract in Anglo-American law as reference for the perfection of our laws.
本文详细介绍了英美法的预期违约制度，以此澄清法律界在预期违约制度上所存在的误解，为未来立法完善提供参考。
The unsafe right of defense system and the anticipatory breach system are respectively the important rules of the modern contract law in the civil law system and common law system.
不安抗辩权制度及预期违约制度分别是大陆法系和英美法系现代合同法的重要制度。
The unsafe right of defense system of Continental law system is also similar with Anticipatory breach of contract system in some degree.
大陆法系的不安抗辩权制度与此制度也有相似之处。
An institution of anticipatory breach of contract is chosen in Anglo-American law system, while an institution of the right to plea of unease is adopted in Continental law system.
英美法系国家采用预期违约制度，大陆法系国家采用不安抗辩权制度。
This thesis holds that there two factors lead to the fault:First, the scholars'the opinions about classification of anticipatory breach of contract are not rational in our country.
但是，对于预期违约的形式分类的认识却不尽合理，导致了立法中对于预期违约制度本身设计上的缺陷。
In traditional civil law system, we can not find the doctrine of anticipatory breach of contract.
传统大陆法系并没有预期违约制度的规定，而只存在与其相类似的不安抗辩权制度。
The system of anticipatory breach of contract which originated from the two cases of the British emperor court was abided by other courts of the countries of the common law legal system.
预期违约源于英国王座法院的两个判例，之后很快得到英美国家其他法院的引用和遵循。
The violation against contract expectant right can be divided into anticipatory repudiation and prospective inability to perform, both of which constitute anticipatory breach.
侵害合同期待权的形态可分为预期拒绝履行和预期履行不能两种，统称为预期违约。保护合同期待权的制度设计应该从这两方面出发。
Chapter 3 introduces and analyses the elements and Law relief of anticipatory breach of contract.
第三章介绍和分析了预期违约制度的构成要件及其法律救济。
Chapter 3 introduces and analyses the elements and Law relief of anticipatory breach of contract.
第三章介绍和分析了预期违约制度的构成要件及其法律救济。
应用推荐