Results The combined treatment was more effective in the treatment group than the control group after 2 weeks of treatment (P< 0. 05).
结果治疗2 周时,治疗组有效率明显高于对照组,两组间的 差异有统计学意义(P< 0。 05)。
Results: 1 the total clinical effective rate was 80% in routine medicine group, 83.3% in traditional Chinese medicine group, and 90% in the composite treatment group.
结果:1常规组在基础治疗的基础上,总有效率为80%,中药组总有效率为83.3%,针药组总有效率达90%。
Results The neurologic impairment score in the treatment group was decreased evidently, the effective rate was 89%, there were significant differences between the two groups (P<0.05).
结果治疗组神经功能缺损评分显著降低,有效率达89%,与对照组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
应用推荐