Inlining a very small accessor function will usually decrease code size while inlining a very large function can dramatically increase code size.
内联一个非常小成员访问函数会减少代码,而内联一个非常大的函数代码会戏剧性的增长。
The change from 24 to 25 in this case is the tipping point for when the cost of inlining is estimated to be more than what is saved by removing the function definition.
在这种情况下,从24到25变化的转折点时,内联的费用估计要比通过去除函数的定义保存。
应用推荐