But even if you accept Mr. Geithner's case that the well-to-do must pay more for their presumed "privilege" of being governed, his story ignores the empirical fact that they already do pay a record share of income taxes, even relative to their share of income.

WSJ: Lawrence Lindsey: Geithner and the 'Privilege' of Being American

In England, on the other hand, the burden is in exactly the opposite direction: the offending speech is presumed to be false, and it is up to the defendant to prove that it is in fact true.

CENTERFORSECURITYPOLICY: How Islamist Lawfare tactics target free speech