We started off talking about binary search, and I suggested that this was a log algorithm which it is, which is really kind of nice.

我告诉了你们这是一个对，数级的算法，这是很棒的,我们来一起看看这个算法到底做了什么。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

So now that we begin to have this ability to express strings in memory, to understand what they are, we can start to apply actually real-world algorithms to them.

现在我们开始用这个技能来在内存中表达字符串,来理解它们是什么，我们可以开始,我们可以对其使用实际的，现实生活中的算法。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Ultimately, we need a filter or a lens to talk about then what is ultimately in control.

最终，我们需要一个视窗，一个镜头,来讨论什么是最终的控制者。

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

So, let's see what the correct answer is, Wakefield and it is, in fact, Wakefield, right, because there's an inverse relationship between how fast a particle is going and what its wavelength is.

所以，让我们来看看,正确的答案是什么，事实上，答案是，因为粒子运动的快慢,与它的波长之间是一个反比例关系。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

What is a sign? Saussure's famous diagrams make it clear enough.

符号是什么，让我们来看看索绪尔有名的图标。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Let's see what happened, so we have Beatrice and your name is Claire Elise.

我们来看看发生了什么,比阿特丽斯和你的名字是,克莱尔·伊莉斯

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

What is it that--First of all, a portfolio, let's define that.

首先，我们来定义一下什么是投资组合。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Let's see how this would play out.

我们来看看这个弹出来会是什么效果。

耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

If we could get clear about what the answer to that metaphysical question the key to personal identity we'd at least know what we needed to find out to answer the question: ? Is this one person or two?

如果我们能知道,那个形而上问题的答案,对于人格同一性的关键,至少我们会知道,我们要知道什么来得出答案：,是同一个人还是两个人？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So we're very focused on, first of all, the cloud and what's in the servers and storage that people access when they go online, what are all the new devices that are coming online, and how do we shift our business to anticipate that and prepare for it?

所以我们特别关注，首先是云技术，服务器,和上网时的存储，上网的新设备是什么，我们如何改变我们的企业,来预测变化并为其做好准备？

斯坦福公开课 - 戴尔CEO-Michael.Dell谈创业和发展课程节选

So let's think about it. This sucker, Mac AIR what's it got in there? That Air Mac, it's, see, it's got, its go-- my Air Mac, I don't know about John's, his is probably better, mine has 1.8 gigahertz speed.

再让我们来看看这台机器，它是什么配置呢？这台，是的，我的Mac，AIR，我不关心John的,他的可能还更好，我的CPU是1。8G的。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

So if we have a look at what the answer would be, this looks very familiar.

如果我们来看看答案是什么，它看起来非常的熟悉。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

We, too, understand the relevance of what we call "the society function."] Rather it must be elucidated in its full extent through the problem of the evolution of literature.

你们不要以为我们很幼稚,我们也明白社会功能的意义是什么],但是我们必须用,文学进化的角度来解释它的功能。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

This would be? Well let's think through this in one additional way and that is--notice that in duple meter we have a strong beat, right "Strong, weak, strong, weak, strong, weak, strong weak" in that sense or if we have triple it would be "Strong, weak, weak, strong, weak, weak."

是什么呢,我们用另一种方式来想,这个,你们知道二拍子,有很强的鼓点,对吧,强,弱,强,弱,强,弱,强,弱,那在这种情况下如果我们拿一段三拍子,那就会是,强,弱,弱,强,弱,弱

耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

Well, one way of course is to accept the objection and say " "You're right Death isn't really bad for me " And some philosophers have indeed accepted that very conclusion, maybe Epicurus Most of us want to say " "No, no Death is bad for me" So we need a better answer to the ?" "Oh yeah? When is it bad for you?"

一种方式当然是接受它并说,“你是对的，死亡对我来说真的没什么坏处“,而一些哲学家确实接受了,那个结论，也许比如伊壁鸠鲁,我们大多数人想说,“不，不，死亡对我来说有坏处“,于是我们需要一个更好的答案来回答,“是么？，它什么时候对你有坏处了“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Let's think it through a second, If she stays in what's her payoff?

我们来思考一下,如果她参选,她的收益是什么

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So we look at the definition of a strictly dominated strategy.

我们来看看什么是严格劣势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So let's just think exactly what this means, and that means that if we take away function and we define it in terms of n, l and m sub l, what we're defining here is the complete description of an orbital.

让我们来考虑一下这是什么意思，这是说如果我们不考虑波函数,而是用ｎ，ｌ，ｍ下标ｌ来定义它，我们定义的,是一个轨道的完整描述。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选