We see that the radius is shorter, so that means that the nitrogen-nitrogen bond is going to be shorter.
我们看到这个距离更短,这就意味着,氮与氮之间的键应该更短。
All right so I probably should have chosen a shorter number 71 because now I can't figure it in here, but let's call it 71.
好的,我可能应该选择一个更短的数字,因为我不能指出它,我把它叫做。
So if we look at its length, it's actually shorter than a single bond, but longer than a double bond.
因此如果我们看它的键长的话,它实际上比单键更短,却比双键更长。
But what's even worse is I'm going to get even less than the average amount of life.
但更糟糕的是,我活得比平均寿命还要短。
I just reduced it to a smaller version of the same problem.
我刚刚把它简化为一个更小的同类问题,这就是我可以写出能解决更短字符串的例子。
- And because I'm writing out a string that's the same length -- -- my strings aren't getting shorter -- it's creating this illusion of some animation.
因为我写了一个长度相同的字符串-,我的字符串不会变的更短-,它生成一个动画幻觉。
Is a hydrogen bond shorter, or is a nitrogen-nitrogen triple bond going to be shorter?
是氢的键更短,还是氮与氮的三键更短?
So, most people could recognize that light wave a has the shorter wavelength. We can see that just by looking at the graph itself -- we can see certainly, this is shorter from maxima to maxima.
0秒钟,好的,不错大部分,同学都可以判断出来这个光波的,波长更短,我们仅通过,看图就能看出来-可以。
But we might then wonder, for every person who gets less than the average amount of life-- suppose we take the median, take the amount of life that's exactly, 50 percent of the people get more, 50 percent of the people get less.
但是接着我们可能会想,对于所有活得比平均寿命要短的人-,假设我们取中间数,相对于平均寿命,刚好五成的人活得更长,五成的人活得更短。
We can know this information even if we just knew that the bond was stronger, we wouldn't need to look at a graph here, because it turns out that if you have a stronger bond, -- that also means that you have a shorter bond -- those two are correlated.
我们依然可以得到上面的信息,即使我们所知道仅仅是这个键更强,我们不需要去看这个图,因为事实上如果你有一个更强的键,这也就意味着你有一个更短的键-,这两点是互相关联的。
We can also think about the distance, the bond distance. So, which would you say is going to be shorter in this case?
我们还可以考虑一下距离,键的距离那么,大家认为其中哪一个键会更短一些?
应用推荐