• Maybe Merton Miller is right-- these things are "neutral mutations" and changes in dividend policy are meaningless.

    也许莫顿·米勒是对的,这些都是"中性突变",变更股利政策是无意义的

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • There is now no preference--well it could be-- there are lots of complexities in the tax law but, basically, dividend policy really is irrelevant now.

    这就没有偏好差别了,税法中仍有很多复杂条款,但基本说来,是否推行股利政策与此无关

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • I'm saying that, unless tax considerations intervene, dividend policy is really irrelevant for a firm.

    除去税收的干扰,股利政策对公司是无相关性的

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • What Modigliani and Miller said, if it's pure dividend policy, then it is totally irrelevant; it means nothing, so companies can do whatever they please-- I don't care.

    莫迪利阿尼和米勒的观点是,如果是单纯的股利政策,则与之完全不相关,它没有意义,所以公司可以任意施为,我不在乎

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • They said, dividend policy is irrelevant.

    他们说,股利政策是无关的

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定