It's a little more straightforward now, but even then semantically frankly it's a little confusing.

现在这就稍微简单点了，但是，根据语义，它有点令人困惑的。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

And what it's saying semantically is, using that variable as my placeholder, have it walk through this collection, starting at the first thing, execute that code, then the next thing, execute that code, and so on.

它的语义意思就是，把这个变量应用为我的占位符，用它来遍历这个集合，从第一个元素开始，执行代码，然后下一个元素，再执行代码。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

What's the point? Again, you can have things that are syntactically legal but not semantically meaningful, and static semantics is going to be a way of helping us decide what expressions, what pieces of code, actually have real meaning to it. All right?

重点是什么？重申，你可以有东西在语义结构的逻辑上有意义,但是在语义上无意义，而static语义,将是一个帮助我们,决定哪些表达，哪部分的代码实际上，有意义的途径，好么？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选