-
The logic, the beauty, of Comus' rhetoric seems often to overpower the Lady's own, which is itself admittedly beautiful and powerful.
该逻辑，或者说美丽的修辞，压倒了小姐本身，是公认的美丽和强大。
-
Archie, of course, can't stand this because for him it's perfectly clear that a rhetorical question is a rhetorical question.
阿齐当然无法忍受，因为对他来说,很明显修辞问句就是修辞问句。
-
The rhetorical strategy that Milton uses to give us this perspective of eternity is what Geoffrey Hartman called Milton's counter-plot.
弥尔顿习惯于展现给我们的修辞性的手法,这种永恒的看法正是被哈特曼称为,弥尔顿的反策略。
-
Its rhetoric is so flat and unemotional, so overtly unrhetorical.
它的修辞如此平白流畅不带感情，仿佛不是修辞本身。
-
And what's interesting is that if you look at the utopian rhetoric it almost always includes hints of this utopian relationship to schooling.
有意思的是,如果你了解乌托邦这一修辞比喻,其含义常常包括,与教育的乌托邦一般的关系的暗示性信息。
-
So if you were learning rhetoric, for example, you might practice giving speeches at the gymnasium.
如果你在学习修辞学，就可以在运动场通过演讲来练习。
-
Do we believe him in this respect, I mean an important question, do we believe him again, ? is he being sincere in this or is he using this as it were a kind of rhetoric ? with which to envelope himself?
我们相信他这番言论吗，我意指一个重要的问题，我们再次自问是否要相信他，他这么说时是否诚恳,或只是利用这类的修辞,来包裹自己？
-
And it's this rhetoric of anticipation, this language of looking forward, that structures all of Milton's own narratives about his own literary career.
正是这种预期修辞学，这种期待的文字，构建了所有弥尔顿的自述,和他自己的文学事业。
-
De Man's point is a question is both rhetorical and grammatical, and the one cannot be reduced to the other. Both readings are available.
德曼想指出的是，一个问句既是修辞型问句又是语法型问句，那么一个不能变成另一个，两种理解都有效。
-
It must be, after all, a grammaticization of rhetoric," the whole point of which is that the worm of interpretation keeps turning. All right?
那一定是将修辞语法化“，整个观点,诠释的螺丝一直在旋转，对吧？
-
There is this wonderful overarching voice that unifies everything after all. This is what I call," says de Man, "the rhetoricization of grammar, right--but wait!
有这种包罗万象的声音,它把所有东西都联合起来，这就是我所说的“，德曼说，“语法的修辞化，对了，等等！
-
Edith, a reader of sublime simplicity, as de Man says, misinterprets the rhetorical question as a grammatical question: "What is the difference? I'm curious to know."
而依迪斯一个极端天真的读者，正如德曼所说，错误地将这个修辞问句理解成一个语法型问句：,“区别在哪里呢，我想知道“
-
They cannot be reconciled as traditional students of the relationship between rhetoric and grammar in studying the rhetorical and grammatical effects of literature take for granted.
它们不可能和解,像传统的修辞学与语法学关系的学生,在研究修辞学和语法学对文学的影响之时想当然地做的那样。
-
This is a recurring rhetoric, this notion that there is a cancer in the body politic.
这是一种经常反复出现的修辞，这个国家的政治体系是有潜在的危险的。
-
One of the most remarkable things about this text is that it's invariably the soaring, libertarian rhetoric that we end up noting, that we end up remembering, and that sticks with us.
这文章中最值得注意的一点是,这不断激增的翱翔的自由的修辞，让我们，最终注意到最终记住，最终永不会忘记。
-
I don't care what the difference is" is the meaning of the rhetorical question.
我不管区别在哪“,是这个修辞的问句的意思。
-
By the way, I'm going to leave also to your sections the strange confusion that ensues in taking a rhetorical device, metonymy, and making it synonymous with grammar on the axis of combination.
另外，我还将把奇怪的困惑留给你们思考,这个困惑随着使用修辞学策略和转喻而产生，并使得它在结合轴上与语法有着同样的意思。
-
A mobile army of metaphors, metonymies, anthropomorphisms in short, a sum of human relations which became poetically and rhetorically intensified," "and are now no longer of account as coins but are debased."
一支由暗喻，转喻，拟人组成的机动部队,简单来说，人们之间的关系,诗意般地在修辞上加强了“,人们之间的关系不再值钱，而被贬低了“
-
Another question, right?
这又是另一个修辞问句了，是吧？
-
He makes a perfectly plausible argument to the effect that the question is grammatical rather than rhetorical.
他提出了一个貌似非常可信的论据,大意是说这个问句是语法型的，而不是修辞型的。
-
I speak in a figurative way about the relationship between the earth and the sky, and I believe that there's a sky god.
我用一种修辞法,来说天地关系，我相信有一个天神。
-
Nobody can possibly miss in reading Eikhenbaum's rhetorically rather bizarre essay his obsession with struggle, with the fight, and with doing battle.
读完艾肯鲍姆,那篇修辞古怪的文章后，没有人会注意不到他对斗争和挣扎的热衷。
-
I move from speech to belief because I simply don't believe that I'm using figures of speech.
我从说转为了相信,仅仅因为我不相信自己正在使用修辞。
-
Now the rhetorical question completes the usual reading of the poem.
这首诗以修辞型问句结尾。
-
He positions pro-censorship argument alongside anti-censorship rhetoric or metaphor, and there are dozens of moments in which it's just these opposites that are being asked to coexist in some kind of peace.
他把支持控制出版的论点和反对控制出版的修辞和,比喻放在一起，有无数次这样的对立,被要求和平共处在一起。
-
Continue the passage: "This grasping which is free of the 'as' is a privation of the kind of seeing because he shifts his rhetoric] in which one merely understands."
继续看文章：,这种没有先入之见的解读是,不存在理解的，大家可以看出海德格尔为之深深吸引了,因为他改变了修辞“
-
It's just this kind of rhetorical trick that Milton uses - so many rhetorical tricks like this that Milton will use throughout the poem -- that led Dr. Johnson to say in utter exasperation, but admiration, that "Milton wrote no language": this isn't English that Milton is writing here.
正是弥尔顿使用的这种修辞手法,-弥尔顿全诗使用了大量这样的修辞手法,-让约翰逊博士懊恼而又钦佩的说，“弥尔顿所写不是语言“,弥尔顿这里写的不是英语。
-
I guess this passage isn't rhetorical after all.
我想这篇文章一点都不是修辞的。
-
It's as if a gap has opened up, a gap between the official argument of and the rhetorical figures or the metaphors, Milton's elaborately construed language, which he uses to illustrate that argument.
这就像是一个鸿沟在专著中的正式论点,和运用修辞和比喻的部分之间打开了，弥尔顿精心地解释和分析他用来，阐述这个论点的语言。
-
He's claiming only that it is available and can be adduced from what we call "evidence" in the same way that the symbolic interpretation, based on the rhetorical question, is available and can be adduced from evidence -and that these two viewpoints are irreducible.
他只是声称这是一种可能，而且可以从,我们所说的“证据“之中引证得到,同样的，基于修辞型问句之上的象征性诠释，也是一种可能，也能够引证,而且，这两种观点是不可削减的。
应用推荐