If I understand it correctly, science as science insofar as its belike scientific methodology, he needs to be defended.
如果我没有弄错的话,就论文所用的科学方法本身而言,就论文所用的科学方法本身而言,作者的立场应该受到维护。
What kind of methodology for reading would allow us to have something to say about that?
怎么样去阅读,才能让我们能够回答这个问题?
Methodology is going to loom heavy in the discussion of any science and that includes psychology.
在讨论包括心理学在内的任何科学时,研究方法是个重要的方面
The study of what you don't need your brain to do has often drawn upon this weird methodology where— This was actually done in France a lot where they would decapitate people and when— After they decapitated people, psychologists would rush to the body of the headless person and sort of just test out reflexes and stuff like that.
对那些无需大脑参与行为的研究,经常会用到一种古怪的研究方法,实际上这种研究曾在法国出现过多次,因为在法国,犯人会遭到斩首,当犯人遭到斩首后,心理学家们会冲到无头躯体那里,检验躯体的反射行为,以及一些其他的行为
应用推荐