These are stupid questions, because once you understand what they're asking, the answer is just built in. It follows trivially.

这是些很愚蠢的问题,因为一旦你明白了他们的问题,答案就在其中,一切简单明了

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If the soul is immaterial, doesn't it follow automatically, trivially, that the soul can't be destroyed by a material process?

如果灵魂是无形的,是否可以顺理成章地得出,灵魂无法被实体过程所摧毁呢

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

It doesn't follow trivially.

或是自然而然得出结论

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

But we have not yet been able to find a claim,an interpretation, which is true,interesting,fairly special about death, as opposed to trivially true about everything, and giving us some relatively interesting insight into the nature of death.

但还是没有找到一种，真实，有趣并且是死亡独有的，相对于对所有事物的普遍事实来说，并且能给我们关于死亡本质有趣见地的诠释。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选