When he gets back to New York, finally, at the end of this first road trip, he has missed Dean.
当他终于回到纽约时,在这首次旅途的末期,他弄丢了迪恩。
First, I lost my keys, I lost my cell phone, and my shoes broke.
一开始,我先是丢了钥匙,后来又丢了手机,我的鞋也坏了。
You have two tickets, $400 worth, and on the way to the concert you lose the tickets.
你买了两张,共值400美元,然而在你去音乐会的路上,你把两张票弄丢了。
But the servant who had been given only one talent hid the talent in the earth so as -- perfectly understandably ] - so as not to risk the only talent that he had been given.
但只得到一枚金币的仆人,把他的金币藏了起来--这可以理解,-为了不使这个他仅有的,金币丢了。
These people are all drinking and leaving these poor little children to their own devices.
当这些人觥筹交错的时候,他们就把这些可怜的孩子们丢在了一边
Even to raise such a question seems to pose insuperable obstacles.
光是提出这样的问题,就像是丢出了许多不能克服的障碍。
Then you either got nothing at all, or you got very lame responses.
人们要么无言以对,要么就丢给你很没有说服力的答案。
Some hero will be called Dios, meaning godly, god-like, Diotrephes, reared as a god, Isothesos, equal unto a god, and there are others as well.
一些人物会被称作迪奥斯,意为神圣的,像神一样的,丢特腓,被当作神抚养大人,伊索赛奥斯,意思是和神一样的,另外还有一些类似的词语
And so, in fact, the version that I commented out which is also in your handout and I'm now going to uncomment, let's get that one out, get rid of this one-- notice the only change.
所以事实上,我之前注释掉的版本,你们的讲义上也有,我打算把注释去掉,我们把他拿出来,把这个丢到一旁,注意下唯一的改变。
You have a tube, a transparent--a tube--a hollow tube, and at the top of the tube you throw a ball through so it whips through the tube and it comes out.
用一根管子,一根透明中空的管子,从管子最上面,你丢进去一个小球,小球迅速穿过管子,飞出来
But then the question is, for Aristotle, the question he poses for us is: Logos What is the connection between logos, ? the capacity for speech of rationality, and politics?
但问题是,对亚里士多德而言:,他丢给我们的问题是:什么,即辩论合理性的能力与政治之间的关连?
In fact, the three justices, the three judges, who were in charge of the judicial trial of Charles I, King Charles, the one who lost his head, those three judges later found a home where?
实际上,那三个法官,主持了查理一世审判的法官,查理一世丢了头,这三个法官后来在?
But, in economic terms, there's no difference between losing the tickets and losing $400, so why do you behave differently?
但是,从经济学角度上看,丢了票和丢了400美元没有什么不同,但你为何会做出不同的反应呢?
Now Mr. Milton took some risks when he separated himself from his cash and lent money to his clients, or lent more money to his clients than the collateral, the gold, was actually worth. And the motive for that risk, of course, the motive for that investment, was the expectation of a profit.
但是弥尔顿先生却冒着把自己和他的现金,也丢了的风险,或者借出去的钱比担保财产还要多,他这么投资的动机是,希望获得收益。
The question they asked people is: would you go to the window and buy another pair of tickets for $400, having lost them?
他们的问题是:,若票真的丢了,你会去售票窗口,再花400美元买两张票吗?
应用推荐