Results:The effective rate was 90.2% in the treatment group with a better therapeutic effect (P<0.05).
结果：治疗组总有效率为90.2%，与对照组疗效比较差异有显著性意义（P<0.05）。
Result The effective power in treatment group can be enhanced obviously.
结果治疗组能明显提高治疗有效率。
Result The effective rate in the treatment group was 95.20 % and 78.13 % in the control group.
结果治疗组有效率95.20%，对照组78.13%，穴位贴敷疗法疗效优于针灸治疗（P<0.05）。
Results The total effective rate was 94.2% in treatment group and 78.1% in control group(P<0.05).
结果治疗组总有效率为94.2%，对照组为78.1%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。
Results: Compared with control group, the total effective rate increased significantly in treatment group (P<0.05).
结果：与对照组相比，治疗组有效率显著增高， 差异具有显著性意义（P < 0。 05）。
Result:The total effective rate in the treatment and the control group was 89.3% and 64.3%respectively(P<0.05).
结果：治疗组总有效率89.3%，对照组总有效率64.3%，两组比较有显著性差异（P＜0.05）；
The total effective rate in treatment group was than the control group(P<0.01).
治疗组总有效率优于对照组（P<0.01）。
The total effective rate of clinical effect was 88.1% in treatment group and 52.9% in control group.
治疗组总有效率为88.1%，对照组总有效率为52.9%，治疗组疗效明显优于对照组。
The total effective rate of clinical effect was 88.1% in treatment group and 52.9% in control group.
治疗组总有效率为88.1%，对照组总有效率为52.9%，治疗组疗效明显优于对照组。
应用推荐