用止血药组与对照组之间的各项指标无显著差异。
Every index in dicynone group had no significant difference from that in control group.
其中观察组与对照组各40例。
镇痛作用与对照组相比差异不明显；
上述指标与对照组比较均有显著性差异。
干预组与对照组颈总动脉血管壁未见异常。
The common carotid artery walls in intervention group and control group were normal.
分为治疗组与对照组。
DM组血浆蛋白C活性与对照组间无显著差异。
There was no significant difference in plasma protein C between DM and control.
结果治疗组与对照组相比较，有效率有明显提高。
Result: there is a marked difference in the effect between the two groups.
心搏指数与对照组比较有所增加（P<0.05）；
Cardiac Index was increased in treatment groups than that in controls(P<0.05);
各试验组与对照组的抑菌率之差均大于2 6 %。
The inhibition rate deviation of experiment group and contrast group is over 26%.
治疗组与对照组比较有统计学差异（P＜0.05）。
There is significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).
实验组与对照组相比有显著性意义（P<0． 01）。
The median survival time was significantly prolonged in the experimental group (P< 0.01).
方法：采取回顾性研究的方法，试验组与对照组相比较。
Method approach to retrospective studies, the experimental group compared with the control group.
结果：护理干预组与对照组在应激反应方面存在显著差异。
Results: There were significant differences therapy in stress reaction in group nurse service and control.
在治疗效果方面，康复组与对照组比较也有显著性差异P。
The effect of medication was better in rehabilitation group than control group (P<0.01).
治疗组治愈率80%与对照组有显著差异（P<0.01）。
这两组间差异有显著性，同时与对照组比较差异均有显著性。
There was a significant difference between these results and those of control group respectively.
有些实验组与对照组扩增出相同的条带，但荧光强度有差异。
Some of the same fragments were different in fluorescence strength.
女生实验组与对照组锻炼前后bmi和体脂率均非常显著增加。
BMI and body fat rate of female experimental and control groups was increased significantly.
与对照组相比有显著性差异（P＜0.01，P＜0.05）。
The effect has significant difference compared with that of the control group(P<0.01 , P<0.05).
各手术组正常侧与对照组相比差异无显著性意义（P>0.05）。
There were no significant differences between each operation group and control group (P< 0.05).
通过经济效益分析比较，与对照组比较，试验组提高了10.58%。
According analysis of economic benefits, compare with control group, test group raise 10.58% respectively.
脑电信号的功率谱分析结果显示了接触组与对照组在一些指标上有差异。
Many indices of EEG power spectrum were different between the exposed group and control group.
结果治疗组与对照组比较，突发性聋症状改善更显著（P<0.05）。
Result Symptoms of the experimental group were obviously improved compared with the control group(P<0.05).
结果：治疗组与对照组临床疗效的总有效率分别为86.7%和67%；
Result:Treatment group and control group clinical total effective rate were 86.7% and 67%;
结果疗程结束后，治疗组在有效率和总有效率方面与对照组有显著差异。
Results after complete the treatment course, there is obvious difference in effectiver…
胆红素处理运动组与胆红素处理运动恢复组的这些指标与对照组基本接近。
The level of these indexes in bilirubin-treated groups were similar to those in control group.
再灌注后模拟酶组CF偏低，与对照组比较有显著性差异（P<0。 05）。
While CF in SOD Mimic group was lower than in control group (P<0.05).
观察组与对照组大鱼际掌纹形态分级之间有极为显著性差异（P<0.01）。
There is significant difference between the observation group and control group (P< 0.01).
治疗组总有效率为94.1%，与对照组比较有显著性差异（P＜0.01）。
The effective rate was 94.1% with significant difference (P<0.01) compared with the control group.
应用推荐