这两组间差异有显著性，同时与对照组比较差异均有显著性。
There was a significant difference between these results and those of control group respectively.
上述指标与对照组比较均有显著性差异。
通过经济效益分析比较，与对照组比较，试验组提高了10.58%。
According analysis of economic benefits, compare with control group, test group raise 10.58% respectively.
两者与正常对照组比较，差异有显著性。
But compare with normal person, the difference is significant.
结果：治疗组总有效率为90.2%，与对照组疗效比较差异有显著性意义（P<0.05）。
Results:The effective rate was 90.2% in the treatment group with a better therapeutic effect (P<0.05).
再灌注后模拟酶组CF偏低，与对照组比较有显著性差异（P<0。 05）。
While CF in SOD Mimic group was lower than in control group (P<0.05).
与正常对照组比较有显著差异。
There was very remarkable difference between the patients and the control group.
方法：采取回顾性研究的方法，试验组与对照组相比较。
Method approach to retrospective studies, the experimental group compared with the control group.
心搏指数与对照组比较有所增加（P<0.05）；
Cardiac Index was increased in treatment groups than that in controls(P<0.05);
在治疗效果方面，康复组与对照组比较也有显著性差异P。
The effect of medication was better in rehabilitation group than control group (P<0.01).
结果治疗组与对照组相比较，有效率有明显提高。
Result: there is a marked difference in the effect between the two groups.
治疗组与对照组比较有统计学差异（P＜0.05）。
There is significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).
治疗组总有效率为94.1%，与对照组比较有显著性差异（P＜0.01）。
The effective rate was 94.1% with significant difference (P<0.01) compared with the control group.
结果治疗组与对照组比较，突发性聋症状改善更显著（P<0.05）。
Result Symptoms of the experimental group were obviously improved compared with the control group(P<0.05).
治疗组与对照组比较治疗组效果明显优于对照组，差异有显著性，P<0.05。
The effects of therapy group were significantly better than that in control group, P<0.05.
治疗组与对照组比较治疗组效果明显优于对照组，差异有显著性，P<0.05。
The effects of therapy group were significantly better than that in control group, P<0.05.
应用推荐