This looks like a script, and it is sort of a script, but the interesting details of the testing are left unspecified.
这看起来像个脚本，它确实是一种脚本，但是所有测试中有趣的细节都未涉及到。
For example, applications can be written to use interfaces with the actual implementations left unspecified until run time.
例如，在编写应用程序以使用接口时，可以到运行时才指定其实际实现。
So apart from stirring up a lot of discussions around whether or not the original article was accurate, does this mean JAX-RS has left too much unspecified?
那么除了激起围绕原始的帖子是否准确以外，这是否意味着JAX - RS留下太多不确定的东西呢？
Actually, the information contained by the interface name and function name called disappear at compile time, all that is left is a numeric offset from an as of yet value unspecified pointer.
实际上，由接口名和函数名所包含的信息在编译的时候就消失了，所有剩下的就是从一个还没有指定值的指针开始的一个数字偏移位置。
Actually, the information contained by the interface name and function name called disappear at compile time, all that is left is a numeric offset from an as of yet value unspecified pointer.
实际上，由接口名和函数名所包含的信息在编译的时候就消失了，所有剩下的就是从一个还没有指定值的指针开始的一个数字偏移位置。
应用推荐