In case of the use of an identical sign for identical goods or services, a likelihood of confusion shall be presumed.
如果确将相同标记用于相同商品或服务，即应推定已有混淆之虞。
For that reason, the test of likelihood of confusion is not whether the marks can be distinguished when subjected to a side-by-side comparison.
出于这一原因，测试的可能性是不能混淆的商标是否可以区分的时候受到了并排比较。
The third part mainly discourses the basic judging fundamental the concrete judging factors based on expounding the definition of likelihood of confusion.
第三部分在对混淆可能性的涵义进行阐述的基础上，主要论述混淆可能性的基本判定原则和具体判定要素。
Direct competition is not the sine qua non of trademark infringement; rather the gist of the trademark action lies in the likelihood of confusion to the public.
直接竞争不是商标侵权的必要条件，商标侵权诉讼的主因更多地基于给公众造成混淆的可能性。
Direct competition is not the sine qua non of trademark infringement; rather the gist of the trademark action lies in the likelihood of confusion to the public.
直接竞争不是商标侵权的必要条件，商标侵权诉讼的主因更多地基于给公众造成混淆的可能性。
应用推荐