中英
dialectic
/ ˌdaɪəˈlektɪk /
/ ˌdaɪəˈlektɪk /
  • 简明
  • 柯林斯
  • n.辩证法;逻辑论证
  • adj.辩证的;辩证法的;方言的
    • 复数

      dialectics
  • 网络释义
  • 专业释义
  • 英英释义
  • 1

     辩证法

    它起到了探索真理的作用,这在当时被称为“精神接生术”,也成了著名的“苏格拉底的讽刺”,它是后来的“辩证法”(dialectic)一词的来源。 “爱智慧”中蕴藏着哲学的精神与本质,对后世产生了经久不息,甚至是不朽的影响,它是哲学最好的隐喻定义。

  • 2

     逻辑论证法

    ... plausible 似真实合理的... dialectic 逻辑论证法 consequent 作为结果的 ...

短语
查看更多
  • 双语例句
  • 原声例句
  • 权威例句
  • 1
    There is a new dialectic.
    这是一个新的辩证观。
  • 2
    Hegel's dialectic is not at all materialistic.
    黑格尔的辩证法完全不是唯物主义的。
  • 3
    If you are pursuing a perfect marriage, and are able to work out the dialectic, thinking that context, fine, why not?
    如果你在追求完美的婚姻,并且能够成功地处理这个辩证关系,想想在这个背景下,好的,为什么不呢?
查看更多
  • 同近义词
  • 同根词
  • 词源
  • 百科
  • Dialectic

    Dialectic (also dialectics and the dialectical method), from Ancient Greek διαλεκτική, is a method of argument for resolving disagreement that has been central to European and Indian philosophy since antiquity. The word dialectic originated in ancient Greece, and was made popular by Plato in the Socratic dialogues. The dialectical method is discourse between two or more people holding different points of view about a subject, who wish to establish the truth of the matter guided by reasoned arguments.The term dialectics is not synonymous with the term debate. While in theory debaters are not necessarily emotionally invested in their point of view, in practice debaters frequently display an emotional commitment that may cloud rational judgement. Debates are won through a combination of persuading the opponent; proving one's argument correct; or proving the opponent's argument incorrect. Debates do not necessarily require promptly identifying a clear winner or loser; however clear winners are frequently determined by either a judge, jury, or by group consensus. The term dialectics is also not synonymous with the term rhetoric, a method or art of discourse that seeks to persuade, inform, or motivate an audience. Concepts, like "logos" or rational appeal, "pathos" or emotional appeal, and "ethos" or ethical appeal, are intentionally used by rhetoricians to persuade an audience.The Sophists taught aretē (Greek: ἀρετή, quality, excellence) as the highest value, and the determinant of one's actions in life. The Sophists taught artistic quality in oratory (motivation via speech) as a manner of demonstrating one's aretē. Oratory was taught as an art form, used to please and to influence other people via excellent speech; nonetheless, the Sophists taught the pupil to seek aretē in all endeavours, not solely in oratory.[citation needed]Socrates favoured truth as the highest value, proposing that it could be discovered through reason and logic in discussion: ergo, dialectic. Socrates valued rationality (appealing to logic, not emotion) as the proper means for persuasion, the discovery of truth, and the determinant for one's actions. To Socrates, truth, not aretē, was the greater good, and each person should, above all else, seek truth to guide one's life. Therefore, Socrates opposed the Sophists and their teaching of rhetoric as art and as emotional oratory requiring neither logic nor proof. Different forms of dialectical reasoning have emerged throughout history from the Indosphere (Greater India) and the West (Europe). These forms include the Socratic method, Hindu, Buddhist, Medieval, Hegelian dialectics, Marxist, Talmudic, and Neo-orthodoxy.

查看更多