2.Syntactically句法特征(复合词的词性一般取决于复合词最后一个成分的词性) 3.Semantically语义特征(复合词的意义具有习语性质,许多复合词的意义都不是其构成成分意义和总和) 4.Phonetically语音特征(复合词的单词重音落在第一个...
基于1个网页-相关网页
semantically transparent 语义透明的 ; 可能会以一种语意透明
Semantically incorrect message 无效消息 ; 消息语义错
Semantically Obscure 语意暧昧
semantically synonymous field 语义同义场
Semantically Correct 语意正确
semantically deviant 语意上有偏差
semantically select 语意选择
"semantically empty messages"
以上来源于: WordNet
It also feels semantically wrong to me.
我也觉得它语义上存在问题。
Make sure that merged levels are semantically identical.
要确保合并的级别具有相同的语义。
In HTML 5, you can write this more semantically, as shown in Listing 6.
在HTML 5中,可以按照更有语义性的方式编写这个图,见清单6。
It's a little more straightforward now, but even then semantically frankly it's a little confusing.
现在这就稍微简单点了,但是,根据语义,它有点令人困惑的。
And what it's saying semantically is, using that variable as my placeholder, have it walk through this collection, starting at the first thing, execute that code, then the next thing, execute that code, and so on.
它的语义意思就是,把这个变量应用为我的占位符,用它来遍历这个集合,从第一个元素开始,执行代码,然后下一个元素,再执行代码。
What's the point? Again, you can have things that are syntactically legal but not semantically meaningful, and static semantics is going to be a way of helping us decide what expressions, what pieces of code, actually have real meaning to it. All right?
重点是什么?重申,你可以有东西在语义结构的逻辑上有意义,但是在语义上无意义,而static语义,将是一个帮助我们,决定哪些表达,哪部分的代码实际上,有意义的途径,好么?
应用推荐