The days of the naive approach — where we believe that if a system is object-oriented (or pick your technology), then it's good — are over.
天真方法的日子——我们相信如果一个系统是面向对象的(或选择你的技术),那么它是好的——结束了。
If we can tell the people who are showing what they're feeling from the people who are faking it, then we've got a really good indicator of who to trust and work with.
如果我们可以辨别那些表达自己真正感觉的人和那些假装的人,那么我们就有了一个很好的指示器,可以知道谁值得信任和合作。
Then we must become good code readers if we are to become great code writers.
那么如果我们要想成为很好的代码编写者,首先就必须成为很好的读者。
But then one asks, what are the criteria ? by which we determine the good of the people?
但有人要问了,判断何为人民的福祉的标准是什么呢?
Good.Yeah. If we are longer,longer,longer,and then but it was the same pattern.
很好,对,音乐越来越高越来越高,并延长,延长,再延长,然后,但它的基本形式没有改变。
So Christine is correct in saying that once we delete the strategies 1 and 10 once we realize that those positions are not going to be chosen by our sophisticated candidates then we realize that probably choosing 2 isn't a good idea either.
克里斯汀说的很对,一旦我们剔除了策略1和10,一旦我们意识到,不会有人选择这些立场时,我们会发现,选立场2或9可能也不是个好主意了
应用推荐