They view the act as a legitimate means of resistance to Indian rule.
VOA: standard.2009.04.08
they regret the things as a rule that they didn't try.
他们统一后悔的都是没有尝试过的事。
If I asked you what magazines you read, it turns out people who are right wing read right wing magazines, people who are left wing read left wing magazines, because people don't as a rule enjoy getting information that disconfirms what they believe in.
如果我问你们,你们看什么杂志,我会发现右翼的会看右翼的杂志,左翼的会看左翼的杂志,因为一般来说,人不喜欢接收到,与他们信奉的相矛盾的信息。
As we all know, this only works if there is a pointee, which kind of gets back to rule number one.
众所周知,只有当有指针数据时,这个才起作用,这有点像第一条规则。
Both of them,as we saw in the face of fission, needs to accept a no branching rule.
这两种理论在裂变说法的面前,都需要接受无分支规则。
Plato thought of democracy as a kind of rule by the many that he associated with the unrestricted freedom to do everything that one likes.
柏拉图将民主,想成是一种由多方所统治,并连结到,不受限制的自由,每个人为所欲为。
But so long as there is a non-arbitrary rule of law, then it's permissible.
但只要有一部非专制的法律,那这就是允许的。
One of the funny things is that the emergence of this family farm gives rise to the polis' character as a land in which there is a citizenry, which is to say free men who rule themselves.
有趣的是,家庭农场的繁荣,促成了城邦的兴起,公民制开始在这片土地上萌芽,即自由人享有自由的权利
Well,if you don't find the no branching rule plausible, you're in trouble as a body theorist.
如果你觉得无分支规则不可行,那作为肉体理论者,你就麻烦了。
So the ensuing debate within the dialogue can be read as a struggle again over ? who has title to rule. Is it the people?
所以,接着发生在辩证中的辩论,便可解读为再度陷于,谁有权统治的挣扎之中,是人民吗?
So,if you're not willing to accept the no branching rule, if it strikes you as a bizarre thing to throw in to personal identity, maybe you need to reject the personality theory.
所以若你不愿意接受无分支规定,如果你觉得这个人认同感里很奇怪,也许你就需要否决人格理论了。
And it is precisely this desire to be self-governing, you might say to rule directly, to have a direct part in political rule, that Hobbes saw as one of the great root causes of civil war.
正是这种自我统治的愿望,直接统治的愿望,在政治统治中直接参与的愿望,霍布斯视为是,内战一个很重要的原因。
Here is Hobbes' rewriting of the Golden Rule in terms of these laws of nature but these raise a question for us ? as readers of Hobbes. Right? Don't they?
这里霍布斯从自然法的角度,重写的黄金法则,但是这给我们这些霍布斯的的读者们,带来了一个问题,对吧!不是吗?
So here is a passage in which Aristotle clearly seems to be pointing to the possibility of a kind of universal monarchy under Greek rule at least as a possibility.
从这段中可清楚地看出,亚里士多德,似乎点出一种在希腊统治下,之宇宙王权的可能性,至少是一种可能性。
应用推荐