And, in fact, these are the only two types of nodes that we're going to be describing, so we can actually calculate both the total number of notes and the number of each type of node we should expect to see in any type of orbital.
事实上,我们只,描述这两种节点,所以我们可以,计算任何轨道中的,总结点数以及各种节点数。
So, essentially we're just breaking it up into two parts that can be separated, and the part that is only dealing with the radius, so it's only a function of the radius of the electron from the nucleus.
所以本质上我们把它写成,两个可分离的部分,这部分,只与半径有关,它仅仅是,电子,到核子距离的函数。
After all, if we have premises 1, 2 and 3, Only composite things can be destroyed.
毕竟如果我们有了1,2,3,这些前提,只有合成的东西能毁灭。
And, in a similar point, he maintains that punishment can never be used as an instrument of revenge but only for what he calls the correction or what we would call the rehabilitation of the offender.
同时他还认为,法律上的惩罚是不能作为复仇的工具,而当作为纠正罪犯过错的工具,即我们今天叫的,对罪犯进行改造。
He's claiming only that it is available and can be adduced from what we call "evidence" in the same way that the symbolic interpretation, based on the rhetorical question, is available and can be adduced from evidence -and that these two viewpoints are irreducible.
他只是声称这是一种可能,而且可以从,我们所说的“证据“之中引证得到,同样的,基于修辞型问句之上的象征性诠释,也是一种可能,也能够引证,而且,这两种观点是不可削减的。
Milton's constructing -- it's a remarkable and impossible strategy here, and it's one we can call a strategy of retrospective anticipation Of course, this retrospective anticipation can only be a fiction.
弥尔顿用了--这种手法很奇妙而且不可能,我们可以称之为返顾预测的手法,这是一种。。。,当然,,and,it’s,a,type,of…,返顾预测是不可能的。
So Socrates has what he wants, once we give him premise number two, that the eternal, non-physical can only be grasped by the eternal, non-physical.
所以如果我们同意他的前提二,苏格拉底就得到了他想要的,前提二说永恒,非现实的事物,只能被永恒,非现实的事物认知
And when we talk about l it is a quantum number, so because it's a quantum number, we know that it can only have discreet values, it can't just be any value we want, it's very specific values.
当我们讲,l是一个量子数时,因为它是量子数,我们知道,它只能去分立的值,它不能取到所有的数,它取一些确定的数。
But is has another sense which is not a rhetorical sense, because metaphor is sort of the heart of rhetoric, the rhetorical sense A is B--when, by the way, A we know perfectly well that A is not B. How can A be B? A is only A.
但是is有另外一个意思,修辞之外的一种意思,因为暗喻差不多可以说是修辞的中心,修辞中所说的A是B,顺便说一下,我们十分清楚地知道A不是B,A怎么能是B呢,A就是。
应用推荐