But we will talk more about who these Canaanites were and how complicated, in fact, that presentation is.
但我们将会更多讨论这些迦南人到底是谁,还有这些描述到底有多么复杂。
It gets to the essence of the question of who is best equipped to educate ? future generations of citizens and civic leaders.
这探触到问题的本质,到底谁最适合教育未来的,后代公民及公民领袖。
So he asks who God is, God says, "I am who am I am" or "I will cause to be what I will cause to be."
他问上帝到底是谁,上帝回答“我是自有永有的“,或者“我将会是我本该是的模样“
After logging into the course's website, you'll appear on the top left-hand corner as I just did with your actual names that we know exactly who we're working with and then what you can do is raise your hand sort to speak.
登录课程网站之后,你将被显示在,左上角,通过你们的真实名字,我可以知道我到底是在跟谁一起工作,然后你们可以做的是举手来回答问题。
If we torture this one,this thing,whoever it is, Linda is going to think to itself,I'm Linda.
如果我们折磨这个人,这个东西,不管它到底是谁,它将会心想,我是。
Anyway, the government might buy them back too, so who cares if it isn't forever.
无论如何,也许政府会重新将公债买回来,谁在乎它到底是不是永久的呢
I leave it to my expert colleagues in History of the American West to decide exactly who came up with the term Manifest Destiny, who actually first used it.
我的同事是美国西部史专家,他也许能够,阐述清楚命运天定这个术语是怎么出现的,以及到底是谁第一个用它
In part who I am, that was true.
恩,是的,审视我到底是谁。
So there is the competition for the use of drones.
所以我们还在竞争到底该向谁使用这个。
So things are not... I haven't given you the numbers for the middle but... So you can see that whoever it was who said, you're slightly better off, you score with slightly higher probabilities when you kick to your natural side is exactly right.
所以事情不像是……,我虽然没有给出中路的概率,但是,我们先不管这些数字到底是谁总结的,我们发现我们走运了,当你从自然方向攻门的时候,你进球的概率会稍微提高
We don't know the intended recipient of this letter, and we actually have no idea whether Milton actually sent the letter; but a couple of drafts of this letter actually exist in Milton's own hand, and the letter is clearly a document that Milton had devoted some energy and some time to. We need to look at it.
我们不知道收件人是谁,我们也不清楚弥尔顿到底有没有寄这封信;,但这份信的草稿确实在弥尔顿那里,弥尔顿显然对这封信投入了不少,时间和精力,我们来看看。
Now this is where the omniscient narrator comes in quite forcefully, and gives us something to work on as we analyze Haze and we think about who he is as a character and where he finds himself.
万能的叙述者就这样,富有说服力的出现了,同时在我们分析Haze的时候,给我们带来了问题,让我们去想这个角色到底是谁,他在哪里发现自己。
But there's no way for them to know which one is the one that's deceived.
但无从得知到底谁弄错了。
So the question then comes is given that, do you have the courage to examine who you are, do you have the courage to try to cultivate the capacity to love, not just with them in the abstract, but other human beings, not just your family, but what I call "spill-over love".
因此,问题就是,你有没有勇气去审视你到底是谁?,你有没有勇气去培养自己去爱的能力,不仅仅是抽象的爱,不仅仅是爱家人,而是爱其他所有人,这就是我所说的“满溢的爱”
But, right, who would make such a claim?
但到底谁会做出这样的主张呢?
There's never been any agreement, so far as I can tell, as to who it is we're supposed to be imagining the outside observer to be, and there are all sorts of conjectures.
这里的X到底是谁,就我所知,并没有定论,这个置身于外的观察者的身份仍然不明,关于这点又充满了各种各样的推测。
Again, you might have a discussion about that over which is the easier one.
现在你们又可以讨论一下,他俩到底谁的书读起来更简单些。
应用推荐